![]() … It’s more likely to be ‘28 Months’ than ‘28 Years.’ 28 months gives you one more place to go. ![]() Danny and Andrew and I have been having quite serious conversations about it so it is a possibility. Garland first stirred up buzz for a third “28 Days Later” movie in 2015 when he told IGN, “We’ve just started talking about it seriously. Garland, Murphy and Boyle sat out the 2007 sequel, “28 Weeks Later,” which was directed Juan Carlos Fresnadillo, but the film kept acclaim high for the zombie franchise. The film made $85 million at the worldwide box office on a production budget of only $8 million. Murphy plays a bike courier who awakens from a coma to discover England is in apocalyptic ruin due to a zombie virus. “28 Days Later” is widely regarded as one of the best horror movies of the 2010s. Don and Alice’s children, who were outside the country during the outbreak, are some of the first people to be brought in. Exactly 28 weeks after the outbreak, the American Forces decide to start bringing in people. But a third part would get people in, if it was half-decent.” The infected start to die of starvation, and NATO forces decide to take control of Great Britain. “It’s hard for companies distributing films and for cinema chains to show films, they’re struggling to get people into the cinema unless it’s something like ‘Top Gun: Maverick ’ or a Marvel. “ might come back into focus because one of the things that’s happening in the business at the moment is it has to be a big reason for you to go to the cinema, because there are less and less reasons,” Garland continued. It’s funny, I hadn’t thought about it until you just said it, and I remembered ‘Bang, this script!’ which is again set in England, very much about England. Garland’s script for “28 Months Later” was written years ago and Boyle called it “a lovely idea,” adding, “I’d be very tempted.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |